http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060405/ap_on_sc/landfish_fossil

Quote:


Thank you so very much for that information. Im glad it sort of blurs the distinction between fish and animals. Only tens of millions more nucleotides to go, and we got the transition!!!!!

I'm so glad that the scientists have long known that fish evolved into animals when there still IS NO SHRED OF PROOF!!!

Thanks guys, and please... blow it out your pooper.

http://www.riprense.com/lightrail.htm

is there any truth in this article? 

why is it categorized as global warming caused by humans, when the last ice age melted off there was obviously global warming....  Could global warming be natural? nawwwww.

/sarcasm

I just finished playing a session of Oblivion, and now I want some smack...

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-04-0...

This crackhead scientist is claiming that violent video games are linked to increases in "risky behavior."  Word to your mother: correlation doesn't necessarily equate to causation.

This story is tied to "young men" having "just played a violent video game."  They should have also tested young men having just finished other activities that increase adrenaline levels, because I'd bet "raised adrenaline levels increase risk-taking behavior" is the real non-story here.



-b0b
(...gives up.)

"So is aging now considered evolution? "

Aging is an interesting word and we must understand the meaning as it is used.  The theory of relativity shows that something moving at a high rate of speed will see less time than something moving at a slow rate or not moving at all.

I have a theory that I would like to share with you....
Consider, the earth rotates at just over 1,000 miles per hour and the earth orbits the sun at about 66.5 thousand miles per hour.  Many times people ask the question, "what would happen if the earth suddenly stopped".  Well, I propose that everything would die of old age in a very very short time.  But notice that I just used the word "time" which is calculated by the Earth's orbit and rotation.  So if the earth stopped rotating and orbiting, would time stop or stand still?

Stick
(...just broke is brane) 

Of course you're assuming time is a contruct of mankind and therefore subject and therefore not real.  When applying the theory of relativity one must take into affect that not only is time real (in the sense that it permiates throughout the universe) but that it is also related deeply with the three dementional space.  This has been proven to be true on many occations leading credit to the theory.  However if you study quantum physics, it and Einsteinium physics cannot co-exist one is either right or wrong, or they are both wrong (I wouldn't want to set up a straw man arguement like evolutionists do).

As for the earth hypothesis this is an interesting one.  You see, we have no clue what gravity is.  Is it a wave?  Is it a particle?  Is it a wavicle?  Or, as one theory suggest is it just a effect of centrifical force that the earth and everything else creates.  So as the Earth spins we are all kept on the earth by centrifical force rather than gravitational force as we know it now.  If the earth was to stop suddenly, yes we would all fling out into outer space.  The earth is slowing down, that's why we have to add time to our calendars from time to time (Leap days and whatnot).  So if we are slowing down that means the earth must have been going faster in the furute.  i say that this proves the earth isn't 6 billion years old because the rate at which the earth is slowing down is basically constant and the rate at which it was originally spinning could only reach a certain speed till you couldn't have life "evolve" or survive.  Having a young earth model accounts for this and many more problems with the old earth theory.

X
(Love these discussions)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060412/sc_nm/science_humans_dc

Okay here we go again!

"An international team of scientists have discovered 4.1 million year old fossils in eastern Ethiopia that fill a missing gap in human evolution."

Now lets look at this amazing specimen.

http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/nm/20060324/2006_03_24t110807_340x450_...

Wow amazing...we can know that this is a missing link even though we don't have a complete skelton.  Oh and it was found in Ethipia?  So that means black people are more primative than us white people!  Of course, Africa, is always viewed this way.

"The remains of the hominid that had a small brain, big teeth and walked on two legs, fits into the one million-year gap between the earlier Ardipithecus and Australopithecus afarensis which includes the famous fossil skeleton known as Lucy, which lived between 3.6 and 3.3 million years ago and was found in 1974."

I could go on and on about how "Lucy" is just a tree monkey...but I won't...I have real work to do.  I predict that all this skeleton is, is just a tree monkey.

"Along with the hominid fossils, the scientists discovered hundreds of remains of pigs, birds, rodents and monkeys as well as hyenas and big cats which gave them an idea of the habitat in which they existed."

Did you know that monkey brains are a delecasy in Ethiopia?  So are pigs, bird, rodents, etc.  Wow, how about early humans ate these "advanced monkies" and all these other animals.  That's why these fossils were found by the food pit.  Why would early man die right on top of the food pit?

Again I can't stress what implications this means.  Evolutionists claim that early life formed in Africa (this is not true).  However since the indigenous people here are indigenous then they are more closely related to the monkies than we, white people are.  Therefore I am corrupting the bloodline by wanting to marry my black girlfriend, since she is more closely related to these early "people".  Don't you see people, evolution is a racist "scientific" theory.  Adolph Hitler used it as a excuse for his concentration camps, Stalin believed in it too and killed more people and Jews than Hitler did, Moa did also, and so did Pol Pot who killed his own black country men in mass genocide!  Also I want to know what the chances of not one specimen but two acutally evolving in the same place at the same time in order to pass along these new traits?  And if they just reproduced with the lesser lifeforms then they would corrupt these newly evolved traits.  But that's nothing to worry about, I mean we've found monkey bones here....err...early human bones!

X

Quote:


I could rant and rave for hours about how useless this "big find" is, but I think I'd be preaching to the choir.

We have thousands of copies of first-era scrolls, manuscripts, and codices for Biblical texts, but somebody finds one codex for this so-called "Book of Judas" and it's suddenly a gospel?  Riiiiiight.

-b0b
(...is glad he doesn't attend the Holy Church of National Geographicness.)