The Geek Crew | |
http://www.TWNCommunications.Net/ForumOLD/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
General Category >> The Mother Board >> Seriously, Get Off My Lawn http://www.TWNCommunications.Net/ForumOLD/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1302575258 Message started by b0b on Apr 11th, 2011 at 10:27pm |
Title: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 11th, 2011 at 10:27pm
New toy! I'll post more (and better!) pics tomorrow when I'm not dead tired.
I needed a shotgun for Three Gun competitions (combined pistol/rifle/shotgun courses), so I picked up this bad boy today. It's a Remington 870 Tactical with a breaching barrel and a pistol grip stock. I'll be adding a magazine extension, sling, and some other goodies for Three Gun. -b0b (...w00t!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 14th, 2011 at 7:49am
That's an awesome purchase. Incidently, I am going today to pick up my Rem. 870! The only prob. I have with it is not all of it is black. But it seems like the parts that aren't would be easy enough to replace.
Has anyone heard anything about AR 15 Carbon? Someone is selling it for $650 and I was seriously considering buying it from them (pic attached). Also, other than shooting it, what would be some things to look at to make sure it isn't too good to be true? X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 14th, 2011 at 4:59pm
My new one.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 14th, 2011 at 9:22pm
Dude, sweet 870, and crazy timing! Were you just looking for a shotgun, or are you planning on hunting or something? I'm jealous of the vented rib on the barrel! I wanted to get one, but couldn't get that and the stock I wanted together, so I'll have to replace my barrel eventually.
If you want to replace the wood furniture with black polymer, there are several vendors. Knoxx Tactical is very well regarded for their collapsible stocks. In addition to the obvious benefits of a telescoping stock, the Knoxx models also reduce the recoil considerably. That could be very beneficial if you plan on putting a lot of rounds down range. As for the Carbon 15, they're very decent Bushmaster ARs that really run the gamut in terms of configuration and options. Carbon 15s are available in pistol and rifle configurations in a variety of pistol and rifle calibers. You can see the current lineup here: http://www.bushmaster.com/catalog_carbon15_index.asp Once you've found your model, take a look at GunBroker.com. That site will give you a decent idea about the reasonability of the asking price for a used gun. As long as the gun is in decent operating condition and it has the features you want (e.g. caliber, barrel length, receiver type), I'd say the price you quoted sounds incredibly reasonable. -b0b (...yay AR15!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 15th, 2011 at 1:06pm
I was looking for a shotgun for home defense. Got it used at Gander Mt. for a decent price and the people there helping were awesome. If you're jealous of my vented rib then I'm jealous of your pistol grip stock. I might look into those places so thanks.
Thanks for the info on the AR-15. Unfortunately, the guy lives in Saginaw and that's a big trip for a model that doesn't exactly meet what I want. But I can wait. I'm 1/4 of the way through my "need" collection before I start on my "wants" which is nice. Besides the AR-15 M4 model, I want the Remington 700 for my long range and Ruger CRR for my .22. If you see anyone selling them for a good price, let me know. X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 15th, 2011 at 8:40pm
I'm also looking for a Remington 700 for a long-range gun, although I might hold out and save up for my super-duper-ultra dream gun...
If God needed a rifle, he'd carry a Dragunov. -b0b (...drools.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 17th, 2011 at 3:58pm
Yesterday's three gun course was really fun, and I think I'm addicted already. You guys should really consider giving it a go. We could have our own Geek Crew squad. ;)
Since it was raining during the course, I made sure to strip down, clean, and oil my guns as soon as I got home. Here's some random crappy pics, since this thread needs more gun pr0n. -b0b (...can't wait to shoot more stuff!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Apr 18th, 2011 at 1:45am
Nice pics bob, and that three gun course sounds pretty interesting. I have some gun pr0n to add to this thread... I'll take some pics soon.
Also, how much is that Dragunov? |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 18th, 2011 at 8:56am MediaMaster wrote on Apr 18th, 2011 at 1:45am:
You'd better not hold out on us! I've set a recurring calendar reminder so that I can bug you until you show us the goods! Quote:
A real Dragunov costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $3,000 to $3,500 dollars. Pristine samples with matching numbers, match-grade wood, and authentic scopes can be even pricier. You can buy knockoff look-a-likes called PSLs for about $1,000, but a PSL is just an AK-47 that's been kitted out to look like a Dragunov. -b0b (...would sell FatMan's kidney for a Dragunov.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 20th, 2011 at 4:29pm
Bob,
I'm looking for some good target ammo for my Rem. 870. CheaperThanDirt has a lot and I'm trying to find some good bulk stock. Any suggestions? Should I stick with shooting Slug/Buck or is another type better for target ammo? Thanks, X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 20th, 2011 at 5:24pm
It depends on the type of target you're shooting. If you're shooting at paper targets, I'd recommend going with lighter shot shells. Anything from #6 to #9 will work, but I generally prefer #7.5 or #8.
If you're shooting at steel targets (knock-down silhouettes, pepper poppers, etc), you might want something a little heavier to ensure you fully neutralize the target. Be really careful with slugs, though. Slugs absolutely must not be used on most metal targets due to the high fragmentation rate. With a shotgun, accuracy is mostly dependent on the choke you're using and the length of the barrel. I'm currently using a compensated "intermediate choke" that forces shot pellets into a moderately tight cone. This provides a 50/50 trade-off between accuracy (all pellets in a small area) and spread (all pellets spread out). So, now that I've rambled, I'd recommend going with #7 or #8 shot. Any major brand will do just fine, but I'd stay away from Fiocchi. I had serious problems cycling the pump on both my 870 and Mike's 870 this weekend using Fiocchi ammunition, which is a huge deal during a timed competition. -b0b (.../ramble.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 22nd, 2011 at 11:29pm
I just picked up some target ammo for my 870. I'll run it through the paces this weekend and let you know how it goes.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 25th, 2011 at 9:31pm
Yeah, that ammo I posted above? Don't buy it. Federal seems to be having some quality control issues.
I took a couple boxes out this weekend to run them through the 870, and the bottom row of shells from both boxes were excessively rusty. I sent an e-mail to Federal's customer support last night, no word back yet. -b0b (...grrr!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 27th, 2011 at 9:41pm
I added a 2-round extension to my 870 last night. It seems to cycle well, but I need to get back to the range to throw a couple boxes of shells through it. Adding the extension is pretty easy and only requires a bit of Dremel work.
Here's a shot of the old magazine. The original mag cap will be removed and replaced by the one-piece extension. The original mag cap, spring, and plastic spring retainer are removed. The spring retainer is held on by two metal nubs that are punched into the magazine. The nubs must be removed with a half-round file or a Dremel. Here's a picture of the partially removed nubs. After the nubs are removed, the magazine is thoroughly cleaned with a regular shotgun cleaning kit. I used a gun bluing pen ($5.00 at any gun store) to cover the bare metal, then thoroughly oiled the magazine. After the extension was screwed on, I used a magazine/light clamp to hold the extension in place. The extension was really solid and this ended up being totally unnecessary, but I'd already bought the clamp and decided to use it anyway. -b0b (...now has 7+1 rounds instead of 5+1.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 1st, 2011 at 10:25am
Since Briney hasn't posted his pictures yet, here's more random gun pr0n. Magpul PMags (polymer AR-15 magazines) were on sale last week, so I picked up three of them. I also picked up a pack of Ranger Plates, which replace the flat PMag bottom with a rubber doohickey that is used as a finger hook for fast mag changes. It also reduces the impact on the magazine if it is dropped on the ground when empty, which is common procedure for competitive shooting.
I picked up a double magazine holster to keep my reloads on my belt, which is shown in these pictures holding the magazines together. -b0b (...needs a few more.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on May 1st, 2011 at 1:22pm
Sometimes you whackos scare me.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 2nd, 2011 at 12:24pm
Sorry, Wes. Does this fit your style any better?
-b0b (...bedazzled!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on May 2nd, 2011 at 7:29pm
lol someone had too much time.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 3rd, 2011 at 9:00am
I grabbed those pictures from a forum several years back, but if I remember the story correctly, the pistol belonged to a police officer. Apparently, he kept leaving his pistol in the break room at the police station, which is a pretty big mistake. To bust his balls, his fellow officers painted it pink and purple and added the glitter and stickers.
-b0b (...thinks it beats getting fired.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 9th, 2011 at 1:50pm
I just wanted to point out that Briney still hasn't posted those pictures he mentioned.
-b0b (...is in Florida, or he'd post more pics, too!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on May 9th, 2011 at 5:32pm
AND WHERE IS BATTLEFIELD EARTH AND THE CREATION LECTURE?!?!?!?!
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 14th, 2011 at 7:43pm
DAY 26
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on May 22nd, 2011 at 1:00am
I'm looking at getting this AR-15 very, very soon.
Does anyone have any opinions on this model? http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/38638-55.html X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 23rd, 2011 at 10:00am
DAY 35
Another week rolls by without Briney's promised pictures! -b0b (...can't count much higher than 35.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 23rd, 2011 at 10:04am X wrote on May 22nd, 2011 at 1:00am:
It looks like a decent starter AR to me. My first AR-15 was an Olympic Arms, and it still shoots just fine. They tend to be a bit rougher than other, bigger (and more expensive) names, but they're still very reliable guns. -b0b (...has a mid-ban model.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on May 23rd, 2011 at 1:54pm
Bob,
With all the models that look pretty much the same should I only be looking for a Colt or a Remington or something like that? This O.A. one I found to be pretty cheap for an AR being at $850ish. X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 23rd, 2011 at 2:26pm
Colt is some what like Nike - decent product, but you're paying for the name. Remington is a bit of a no-name in the AR arena, and I've never personally shot one, so I can't really say much about them.
Some of the more popular manufacturers include Bushmaster, DPMS, and Larue. I'd recommend taking a look at Bushmaster to see what you think. They're very well regarded amongst the "black rifle" community, and they're relatively inexpensive. I'm sure you can get a comparable model for about the same amount as the Olympic Arms you listed. -b0b (...can bring out one of each if you'd like.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jun 6th, 2011 at 9:30am
BRINEYGATE - DAY 49
Still no pics! -b0b (...will never forget.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Jun 6th, 2011 at 1:07pm |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Jun 6th, 2011 at 1:08pm
LOL yeaaaa ok ill post pics tonight.
(restart the counter!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Jun 6th, 2011 at 1:46pm
Who's the first to notice?
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Jun 6th, 2011 at 5:47pm
hahaha!
*insert witty female joke here* |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jun 6th, 2011 at 9:36pm
Dude, that article is from... like... 1924! Here's a tougher one for ya...
Can you spot the problem with this H&K promotional brochure? -b0b (...roffles!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Jun 6th, 2011 at 10:25pm
The rounds in the magazine (magazine NOT clip) are backwards.
X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jun 13th, 2011 at 1:55pm
Brineygate - Day 56
So Briney, can you at least describe these pictures you promised us? -b0b (...can bust out MS Paint if necessary.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jun 28th, 2011 at 9:30am
Brineygate - Day 71
Could you at least throw some ASCII art our way?! -b0b (...pew pew!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Jun 28th, 2011 at 4:15pm
hahahahhaha i fail at life... ill post... soon
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jul 18th, 2011 at 10:14am
Brineygate - Day 91
How about a quick sketch on a napkin? You can mail it to me and I'll scan it in! -b0b (...points out that it's been three months!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Aug 29th, 2011 at 10:07am
Brineygate - Date 133
Briney has hit triple digits! |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Sep 26th, 2011 at 12:32pm
Brineygate - Day 161
Never forgive - never forget! |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 15th, 2011 at 11:13am
Cross-posted from the Fall LAN Party thread:
I'm not stopping the Brineygate count because we've only got one gun, but it's a start! Tell us about it, Briney. What kind of scope did you throw on it? Did you buy it as a complete package, or did you build it? Where'd you get it from? Where are you shooting it? -b0b (...guns guns guns!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Oct 15th, 2011 at 4:41pm
Hi all,
Long time, I like to see that all of you are still on here. Also I like to see that X is still holding out for Battlefield Earth, didn't he lose the original footage or something... I just recently moved down to Kalamazoo with the misses, and I was wondering what everyone was up to. Yup, I got married in March, don't feel bad for no invites, we got married on the beach in Puerto Rico. I did a bit of reading, X congrats, glad to see your happy, I can't wait to hear from everyone else and to read some more of what I missed. By the way, for this post, I have the following: an off-brand 12-guage pump, nothing special, a Marlin .22 ducks unlimited edition with scope, got it real cheap, a Remmington Mark III .22 Target Pistol, stainless, and .40 cal HK USP compact, always loaded correctly... I will not hold out on pics like others, but sadly for a day or two I must, my friend is borrowing my digital. That is all for now, pez |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 15th, 2011 at 9:29pm
Shizza! It's good to see you! We were just talking about you at the LAN on Saturday!
I hope marriage is treating you well. I think Wes is the only holdout at this point, and I don't see that changing any time soon. ;p What brings you back to Kalamazoo? Are you teaching at Western? We'll definitely have to plan a gathering of geeks in the near future! pezmasterelite wrote on Oct 15th, 2011 at 4:41pm:
I've got a Ruger Mark I (the much-older brother of the Mark III) in a bull-barrel target configuration, and it's an incredibly fun gun to shoot. It's my favorite pistol to use to teach new shooters. It's incredibly accurate and has absolutely no recoil, which makes it popular with new shooters and the ladies. Come to think of it, I should probably drag it out and oil it up. pezmasterelite wrote on Oct 15th, 2011 at 4:41pm:
A good friend of mine has a full-size H&K USP in .45. It's a fun gun to shoot. I've been thinking about picking up a full-size USP in .40S&W as a secondary carry gun, but it's going to have to wait until I finally pull the trigger (ba dum cha!) on my dream gun: I am thoroughly convinced there is no sexier gun than the Dragunov. -b0b (...welcome back!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Oct 16th, 2011 at 1:44am
Did you hear us talking about you at the LAN last week?!?!?!?!?!?!?
X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Oct 16th, 2011 at 2:53am
Haha, I meant Ruger Mark III, I must have been confused with the shotty talk. I wish mine had the 7.25" barrel, that would be sweet.
We should get together and shoot some things apparently, it will be an all out assault on whatever targets are around. I don't really know of anywhere to shoot here, I will have to join a gun club or something. My brother-in-law is going to western and I have a good friend that recently moved down here, so this is where we choose to live. I am not teaching anymore, I have been teaching Pre-calc, Calc I, II, and Linear Algebra for 5 years, I am sort of burned out on school and academic research. I actually recently skipped out on a PhD studying parallel optimization to start my own gardening business. Things are really going well so far with the gardening business, we will see how the future turns out though. Anyways, I am off to bed finally, hopefully pics tomorrow of the hardware... my buddy will drop the digi off when he is done. pez |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Oct 16th, 2011 at 11:23am
Here they are as promised...
My friend is still using the camera, so I had to use Janelle's, I really remember why I bought my own for the wedding, it is so hard to get a good pic on an old crappy camera... Anyways, here are the crap shots I took just now, perhaps I will clean things and take some with my newer camera when I get it back. The first attachment is for kicks. I guess my shotty is a mossberg, slightly less off-brand, but still cheap as anything else though. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 16th, 2011 at 12:08pm |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 16th, 2011 at 1:18pm
It wouldn't be fair to keep making fun of Briney's missing pics if I didn't post a few of my own. Here is my motley collection of pistols.
-b0b (...Briney, you're up!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on Oct 16th, 2011 at 7:59pm
Is that Andrew? I'll be damned.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Oct 17th, 2011 at 2:24am
What up Fatman, long time. I see that you are out in CO, that is sweet.
I will have to let you know if I go out there, I have family now in Colorado Springs, and friends in Denver. Where is your hardware? pez |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on Oct 17th, 2011 at 10:30am
Oh sweet man, yeah definitely hit me up if you come out and we will have to grab a beer or something.
I sadly, do not own any guns...never been a big gun nut. I however am in the process of picking up a handgun for some home defense, thanks to some advice from Bob and my co-workers. So if and when I buy it, I'll make sure to post a few pics. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 17th, 2011 at 10:50am
I'm pretty sure the size of your manhood is directly proportional to the number of firearms you own.
-b0b (...just sayin'.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by spanky on Oct 17th, 2011 at 7:07pm
Holy crap shizza! Your time between saying you are going to post gun pics and actually doing it is legendary.
Figured I would add mine to this thread also. (So the only ones not to post guns pics are wes and briney) I have a Spingfield XD. Shouldn't be that out of the ordinary as bob and pat have one. Edit: almost forgot, mine is a .45 which is bigger than bob's XD...just sayin! |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on Oct 17th, 2011 at 7:27pm
bob question my manhood again and I will post a picture of it.
Just saying. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 17th, 2011 at 7:31pm The_Fat_Man wrote on Oct 17th, 2011 at 7:27pm:
I hope you've got a macro lens. -b0b (...ba dum cha!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Oct 18th, 2011 at 1:11am
You just got...
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Oct 18th, 2011 at 2:10am
I think they are better for keeping the queen of England out of your business, at least that is always my problem.
Stupid red-coats... Other uses, sorting dishes, changing channels on TV, and making random cowboys fall off their horses. Spanky and Bob, those XD's are awesome, they came out right after I got my HK, I am really impressed with them. I have only shot an XD-40 once, I think it was the basic model. pez |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 19th, 2011 at 4:12pm spanky wrote on Oct 17th, 2011 at 7:07pm:
Your XD might be slightly larger, but mine has fired far, far more rounds than yours - and more accurately I might add. Besides, I have twice as many .45s as you! -b0b (...isn't sure what that means.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Oct 20th, 2011 at 12:19am
Brineygate ends!
also... Andrew!!! welcome back! |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 20th, 2011 at 6:24am
Hey, it only took you 186 days! Nice collection, Briney!
Did you find a crazy sale on the 20rd AR mags or something? How are you liking the MagPul mag? I just started switching over to the windowed MagPul mags with ranger plates, and I'm a big fan. They're inexpensive and very high quality. -b0b (...will post pics. Eventually.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Oct 28th, 2011 at 3:28am
This might help you guys who carry concealed. There have been a few changes to the laws...be informed!
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/msp/MSP_Legal_Update_No._86_2_336854_7.pdf X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Oct 28th, 2011 at 3:56pm
I wasn't aware of how a CPL could carry non-concealed pretty much anywhere, bypassing both "banned zone" lists. That's an interesting loophole. Thanks Stewie!
-b0b (...w00t!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Oct 28th, 2011 at 8:02pm
Yep, I also had a buddy stopped by a county officer who said a CPL holder couldn't open carry.
I knew that didn't sound right, so that's where I found this nifty summary. And ya, that bypass is amazingly interesting. However, if a place still forbids weapons, who have to abide...such as schools. However with schools you can still carry in your vehicle. X (a law gee) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Nov 28th, 2011 at 9:40pm Quote:
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Nov 29th, 2011 at 4:12pm
You beat me to it, Stewie. I was just coming here to post that. ;p
-b0b (...now, if we could only get national reciprocity!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Nov 29th, 2011 at 5:35pm Quote:
Not with States like CA, IL, NY, and our lovable DC. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Nov 29th, 2011 at 10:28pm
Well, national reciprocity wouldn't be valid in states that do not offer "shall issue" CCW permits. It would, however, mandate that licenses from any shall issue state would be valid in any other shall issue state. It passed the House two weeks ago, but the bill is expected to die in the Senate.
-b0b (...super sad frowny face!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Nov 30th, 2011 at 1:36pm
I received my CPL a few months ago and planned to take a honeymoon trip to Tennessee. Since I was going to the Smokey mountains where there are bears and even more scary, hillbillies, I wanted to carry. Of course I got pulled over in Indiana. It was my first time getting pulled over with my CPL and I remembered to notify the officer that I have a CPL and the pistol is in the vehicle. He casually said "ok." Luckily he realized that I was on my honeymoon and wrote me a warning. The CPL probably helped out too because he knew that I was educated by knowing that I could travel through those states legally.
(BTW: Do you have to tell the office that you have a CPL if the pistol is not in the vehicle?) While in Tennessee, I had a slight breakdown and took my truck to the local auto repair shop in the mountains. It was kind of scary like something out of a horror movie. There were about seven dirty guys that looked like they hadn't seen a woman in about a month and the shop was basically a junk yard. I had my wife with me so I was feeling a bit protective. Having my pistol with me was comforting. It all turned out fine and the people were really kind. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Nov 30th, 2011 at 10:19pm
Disclosure rules vary by state, but in Michigan, you must disclose that you have a CCW permit regardless of whether or not you're carrying.
I was hit by a drunk driver several years back and was carrying at the time. The police officer was totally cool about it. Apparently, it's common enough these days that officers don't really care. -b0b (...schwing.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Dec 7th, 2011 at 11:50am
My uncle from Denver told me that his son was pulled over and the officer asked to see his gun. He looked it over and complimented him on his Kimber compact then sent him on his way.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Dec 7th, 2011 at 12:58pm
That's when I make a call to a lawyer and the press and file suit for an illegal stop!
At the very least, ask the officer to be censured for improper use police computer networks. X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Dec 7th, 2011 at 8:23pm
I doubt the stop was directly related to the guy having a CCW. It was the end of the conversation, not the beginning.
-b0b (...shrugs.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Dec 15th, 2011 at 11:11am
Hey, are any of you guys interested in going to the gun show in Grand Rapids this weekend? The Grand Rapids show is usually the best on in the state, and a rift between the show sponsor and the hosting facility is going to make this the last big show.
Be a part of history! We'd be heading out around 10:00am Saturday morning, and admission is usually around $5.00 per person. -b0b (...let me know!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Dec 15th, 2011 at 2:50pm
Sadly I cannot make it as I will be protecting Laura from her crazy family at her Christmas party.
Bring me back something nice! X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Dec 22nd, 2011 at 9:25am
New toys!
A family member was looking at liquidating his firearms collection. Meredith and I chipped in and bought a couple guns. Here is Meredith's purchase: She bought a Henry Golden Boy. It's a beautiful tube-fed lever-action .22LR with a hexagonal barrel. This particular model commemorates the centennial birthday of the Boy Scouts. It's a beautiful gun and a fine shooter. I bought something a bit more modern. You can never have too many AR-15s, so I picked up this beauty. It's a Doublestar Arms lower receiver with a Rock River Arms flat-top upper receiver and an 18" barrel. This model is built in a very similar configuration to my Bushmaster AR15, so I think this is going to be my "project gun" for 3 Gun competitions. I'll likely keep the lower receiver and stock intact and replace the upper receiver with one of these... http://www.stagarms.com/product_info.php?cPath=14_24&products_id=397 Sadly, this purchase will have to wait until I buy a new semi-automatic shotgun. My trusty pump-action Remington 870 is just too slow for competitive use. -b0b (...yay guns!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Dec 22nd, 2011 at 12:41pm
Is your sling a one hinge or two?
I use to think the two was better...but I now have come to view the one as much more tactical. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Dec 22nd, 2011 at 2:05pm
Actually, it's a three-point harness. If one is good and two is better, then three is obviously even more epic!
I've been buying UTG slings from Amazon. They're dirt cheap and surprisingly high quality. I've got one on my Bushmaster, a second on the new Doublestar AR, and a third on my Remington 870. They're a whopping $12.00 on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000JIJ6Y4/ref=oh_o02_s00_i01_details I generally try not to "cheap out" on gun accessories, but again, these are incredibly good quality for the price. I've got a similar three-point harness I picked up at Gander Mountain for $45 and it is much, much lower quality. Here's a good picture of some random guy wearing a three-point harness: I find them to be much more comfortable than a one-point or two-point, not to mention a lot more versatile. You can carry your gun right in front of you and have it up and ready to go in a matter of seconds. This is a big deal for 3 Gun matches, in which you might have to start with your pistol and quickly transition to your rifle. -b0b (...besides, it looks tacticool!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Briney on Jan 4th, 2012 at 11:34am
http://gma.yahoo.com/okla-woman-shoots-kills-intruder-911-operators-okay-091106413.html
Quote:
21 minutes and still no police!!!! wow... |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Jan 4th, 2012 at 1:32pm
I wonder if there are factors that make this ok?
- She's a woman - She's alone - She has a baby Does anyone else think that this may have been different if any of these were the opposite? And yes, 21 minutes is exactly why I have multiple fire arms in my domicile. Heck, you can't even make the old joke of "when seconds count, the police are minutes away" anymore...we're going to have to replace minutes with just the ability or want to make it to your place. I really have to start carrying with me full time. X (thanks for the article) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jan 4th, 2012 at 5:12pm
Oklahoma has castle doctrine. As soon as the bad guy entered the house, he was fair game.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=69782 -b0b (...yay!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Jan 4th, 2012 at 9:17pm
More places should have castle doctrine.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Jan 9th, 2012 at 6:25pm
More gun pr0n!
-b0b (...will have some AR disassembly pics in a couple days.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Feb 18th, 2012 at 9:12am
My collection. Some tactical, some hunting.
From the top: Ruger 10/22 Kimber Pepper Blaster (Wife's) Remington R-15 .223 Springfield XDm .40 Remington 700 XCR TLR .300 Win Mag Remington 11-87 12-gauge Remington 4-10 My next purchase is going to be a nice scope for my 300. The one on there is a Nikkon Buckmaster. Puke! I also want a small revolver for carry. The XDm is a bit heavy. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Feb 19th, 2012 at 1:11pm
Thanks for sharing pics, Stick! I love the AR. It looks like Remington was smart enough to include a low-profile gas block with their flat-top receiver, which is something I can't say for Rock River Arms. What kind of optic do you have on it?
I'm also a big fan of the Remington 700. I've been drooling over them for some time now, and hope to pick one up later this year. -b0b (...guns!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Feb 20th, 2012 at 1:10pm
The optic is the Burris XTS 135. I can hit a steel plate about the size of a 8.5" x 11" piece of paper at 180 yards with this red dot while standing up, about 50% of my shots hit. 223 is an amazing round.
http://www.burrisoptics.com/xts135.html |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Feb 20th, 2012 at 2:46pm
Fantastic. I've been looking at the Burris XTR and the Viper Vortex PST for my AR. I need a good 1-4x scope for 3 gun. Generally speaking, we don't have many shots that exceed 150 yards, which is a good thing because I'm getting a bit rusty.
-b0b (...needs to hit the range!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Mar 22nd, 2012 at 11:53am
http://www.wwmt.com/shared/newsroom/top-stories/stories/wwmt_vid_437.shtml#.T2tFbZDIG5A.facebook
I've been watching this bill kick back and forth in MI. This would be great for us! X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Mar 22nd, 2012 at 5:18pm
Same here. I'm not super-excited about the additional nine-hour training requirement, but I'll take what I can get.
By the way, did you see that dead sexy Springfield Armory XDm in the video? -b0b (...drools!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Mar 23rd, 2012 at 6:50am
Offff course!
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 6:55am
http://www.michigan.gov/msp/0,4643,7-123-1591_3503_4654-10941--,00.html
Maybe someone can help. If I am open carrying, am I legally obligated to show my CPL AND my drivers ID? If I'm concealed carrying, do I have to always have my driver's ID on me? I hate how this doesn't have a law associated with it...just a set of rules. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 8:02am
I may have partially answered my own question:
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/%28S%28tqivtw453edwuk45ym1gdm3f%29%29/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-28-425f For the purpose of my question above, I'm talking about NOT being in a vehicle. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 8:12am X wrote on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 6:55am:
The way the law is written, you must notify the officer any time you're stopped if you're carrying a pistol, regardless of where/how you're carrying. You are only obligated to carry your CPL card when you're carrying concealed. Keep in mind that getting into a vehicle in Michigan with a firearm that isn't properly stored constitutes "concealed carry." Quote:
Yes. You must provide both your CPL and your driver's license upon request. On a side not, there was a court case awhile back in which a judge ruled that furnishing your CPL to an officer doesn't constitute "immediate disclosure," so make sure you verbally inform the officer the moment they make contact with you. -b0b (...is not a lawyer.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 3:00pm
I thought you didn't have to show any identification if you are stopped walking while open carrying because you haven't broken any laws.
Is it possible to open carry in a vehicle? What is the most accessible/shoot-ready way to open carry an assault rifle? |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 3:30pm Stick wrote on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 3:00pm:
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada requires you to identify yourself during a "police investigation". You do not have to produce ID. This is a general requirement and is wholly separate from a CCW issue. Open carry is a huge bag of worms these days. I am constantly seeing reports of people being arrested for "disturbing the peace" or some other ridiculous charge. Although I don't personally carry openly in public (OpSec and all that), I'd love to see open carry rights affirmed throughout the country. Quote:
Not in Michigan. In most states, anything that constitutes open carry on the street would be just fine in a vehicle. In Michigan, if the firearm isn't properly secured for transport (e.g. in a locked container with ammo separated), it is considered concealed. Quote:
Tactical sling, round in the chamber, safety off? I'm not aware of any requirements for the condition of the rifle itself, so long as you're not openly menacing/threatening people. That said, you're going to get an awful lot of attention walking down Main Street with your rifle, let along in "condition one". -b0b (...needs to open carry a Barrett some day.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 4:01pm
Well now, check out this MSP Legal Update 86 - http://miopencarry.org/sites/default/files/MSP_Legal_Update_No._86_2_336854_7.pdf
The very last page, last column. I might carry this around if I open carry. Also, Hibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada is only for states that have "stop-and-identify" laws which MI does not. "Nevada had a stop and identify law, which was used to convict him. The Supreme Court determined that these laws are constitutional, so long as they require officers to have reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_Identify_statutes X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 4:24pm Quote:
Oh, that's right. Michigan is pretty strict about transporting. I was in Colorado prairie dog hunting/killing with the ar-15's in the truck ready to shoot, driving from field to field, then pointing it out the window and shooting at them. It was so much fun. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by The_Fat_Man on Apr 23rd, 2012 at 6:44pm
You came to Colorado and didn't hit me up Stick? Shame on you
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 1st, 2012 at 4:12pm
Too much talk, not enough gun pr0n!
I've been participating in the Kalamazoo chapter of the Friends of the NRA for several months now, and Meredith and I volunteered at their annual banquet (their biggest annual fundraiser) on Thursday evening. The Friends of the NRA is a charity that is attached to the NRA. They raise funds for firearms-related programs for kids (e.g. hunter safety, firearms safety, 4H and Boy Scout shooting programs), women (personal safety, CCW, defense in the home, etc) and a variety of shooting sports and conservation programs. At the end of the banquet, I ended up winning the door prize. I scored a Weatherby SA-08 semi-automatic shotgun chambered in 12 gauge. I had a chance to shoot it on Sunday and it proved to be a very capable firearm. It loaded smoothly and I didn't run into a single hiccup. The operation is a bit different than other semi-automatic shotguns I've fired, so it'll take a little while to get used to the controls. The downside to the SA-08 is that it's not a terribly common firearm, so there are absolutely no third-party products available and virtually no accessories available direct from the factory. I'd like to add a magazine extension, but I'd have to do some serious Dremel work to get a proper fit from an extension manufactured for a totally different gun. I'd also like to get a shorter barrel (22 to 24" instead of 28"), but nobody makes them, so I'd have to pay a gunsmith to cut the factory barrel down. Either way, it was free, so I'm certainly not complaining. It's a fun gun to shoot and I look forward to using it for clays. -b0b (...w00t!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on May 2nd, 2012 at 7:23am
That's awesome! Only the NRA would give out a shotgun as a door prize! Good job.
X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on May 2nd, 2012 at 7:04pm Quote:
This is the fantastic news, and I hope the NRA can get the support it needs to pass this bill! Even with a CCW license, I still have to register my pistols with the state, and that's absurd. -b0b (...at least the "safety inspection" is no longer required.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Dec 15th, 2012 at 9:15am
Hey,
Did you guys see that HB 5225 was enrolled, we still may be able to get rid of the ptp. pez |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Dec 15th, 2012 at 11:48am
I've been watching it pretty closely. With a CCW permit, I don't need the purchase permit, but I still have to register the purchase with the Michigan State Police. That irks me. Sadly, this bill doesn't help in that regard.
Based on the last Senate version of the bill (I can't find the enrolled version yet), it appears the following changes are being made: [list bull-blackball] For non-FFL purchases: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billengrossed/House/pdf/2011-HEBS-5225.pdf -b0b (...definitely a positive step!) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by pezmasterelite on Dec 15th, 2012 at 4:27pm
That is what I noted, one can buy without a ptp at an FFL and then you can also mail in the copy of the paperwork you get from the police. That significantly changes all the running around to buy a gun.
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Jan 29th, 2013 at 5:06pm
Stupid gun control debates have been in the news lately and, gladly IMO, is starting to slide out of the spotlight. I found this to be an interesting video.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/kKpLhNiC8zg |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Feb 5th, 2013 at 2:13pm
Very neat video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJs3OWoxJIM From description: "In 1961 Dad enslisted in the Marine Corps and was issued this M1 Garand. A Springfield Armory M1 Serial Number 1380819. Dad has been looking for it for over 50 years. I found it and purchased it from the Civilian Marksmanship Program in secret. It was a One in Six Millon chance to find it. I found it only fitting that a U.S. Marine should give it back to Dad. I love you Dad." X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Feb 6th, 2013 at 7:10pm
Wow, that really was a one in a bajillion chance. I wonder how he figured out CMP had it?
-b0b (...they go through M1's like nobody's business.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Feb 14th, 2013 at 8:01pm Quote:
|
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by X on Feb 28th, 2013 at 1:54pm
http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1&title=the_fourth_circuit_takes_the_charlotte_m&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
An interesting story that is an offshoot of Terry v. OH (provided police with reasonable suspicious). It is now not legal for police to stop open carry gun owners to be stopped and questions just because they are open carrying (in OC states). X |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Feb 28th, 2013 at 2:24pm X wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 1:54pm:
That was a very interesting read. It's nice to see a court uphold the fourth amendment, which is seemingly less and less relevant with every passing day. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Mar 1st, 2013 at 8:24am
The only time I've seen(not in person) someone stopped while open carrying was when the firearm is a common fully auto weapon. Is the stop merited at that point for reasonable suspicion of being fully auto? The person submitted to the officer that it was a reasonable suspicion and let the officer inspect the weapon.
I would think no. Similarly to when an officer thinks you might have a dead body in the trunk of your car because that's where most people put dead bodies. Unless there is some reason to suspect other than stereotyping, no. |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by b0b on Mar 1st, 2013 at 9:49pm
It doesn't matter whether it appears to be fully auto, because being fully automatic does not mean it's illegal. Based on the fourth circuit's opinion above, the mere possibility of something being illegal doesn't constitute reasonable suspicion.
It'll be interesting to see whether or not this winds up in the Supreme Court. -b0b (...and everybody knows how predictable they are.) |
Title: Re: Seriously, Get Off My Lawn Post by Stick on Mar 4th, 2013 at 10:43am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj9wahCTz08
Here is that video. Near the end the officer claims that the citizen admitted that his suspicion warranted the inspection. What a joke. |
The Geek Crew » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |