The Geek Crew - Print Page

Quote:

These are images from the battle for Monrovia, Liberia, where use of iron sights on a firearm is known to be strictly prohibited. Also prohibited are aiming, assuming a supported firing stance, and any common practice of marksmanship whatsoever. Hip-Hop/Rapper/Gangsta shooting stances are mandatory, with the "Glock Foh-Tay" hold being the most popular. Lethality is acheived by subjecting the target to a wide swathe of area fire, simliar to unaimed indirect artillery, or scaring the enemy away with gesturing and aggressive hip-hop style dancing while firing. Points are awarded for artistic effort, style, fearsome facial expression/vocalizations and the use of blue duct tape.

Note the perfectly executed flamboyant sideways-rifle "Glock Foh-Tay" running stance.

Amazing height and style on this one. Sure to impress the judges!

"Yo yo yo, fo' shizzle!"

The "bring your buddy along" firing stance

Firing from the hip while putting on the best "Game Face" and bellowing like an Ox - always sure to make your enemy skeedadle!

The "Homeless street person" anti-aircraft firing position being executed with great precision!

Here we have a classic! The "prone Warrior " firing position - too bad the magazine spring has blown out from the bottom of his beautifully blue-duct-tape-taped jungle magazine setup.

Here we have Liberian militia demonstrating the "Soul Train" method of combat assault.

The Nautical theme is ever popular, as seen by this militiaman wearing a stylish orange life jacket. It won't stop a bullet, but sure looks Boo-yaa!

This pair is executing the difficult "Phat Bammer Swagger" shooting stance.

The phat "Batman Begins" RPG firing position is new but hot.

While this appears to be a well-rehearsed combat assault maneuver, this militiaman is actually trying to keep birds from crapping on his car. Note the feather duster in the left hand for effect.

This Militiaman executes the one handed high overhead blind shot. It is often used to indicate that "Da Brizzles over there".

And last but not least, these two are showing the proper way to fire a support weapon using the non-aiming duck-walk method, keeping at least five feet of linked ammo strung out from the weapon at any given time! Note the suitably awe-struck onlookers!

This is the last time Alf-Alfa ever messes with me...

Nigga please...

Look at that pitifully rusted FAL. Treating such a beautiful gun in such a horrible manner should be punishable by flogging.

"Where you at?"

Wearing a bright yellow poncho in the middle of a combat zone is all the rage.

Disclaimer: All similarities to Rap Stars, Hip-Hop practitioners and Gangstas of all races, ethnic origins and religions, living or dead, is purely intentional.

This is enough to make me want to send ~~a platoon of~~ two real soldiers over there to kick the crap out of Liberia on principle. On October 3rd, 1993, in Mogadishu, Somalia, we had a a kill ratio of 290 to 1. This is why.

[boondocksaints] We could kill everybody... [/boondocksaints]

-b0b
(...sighs.)

Some racist stuff in there, possibly.

Bull. This has nothing to do with race, and you know it. It has everything to do with adherence to assinine nationalistic ideals. The West has spent billions of dollars trying to pull the central African countries out of their cesspit of a society, but they are all too willing to jump back in.

If these guys want to go out and shoot each other just for the heck of it, that's their perogative. If they want to act all "gangsta" while they're doing it, that's fine, too. However, in doing so, they have completely dissolved any right to play the race card.

If they want to play the ghetto image, they're going to get called on it. Likewise, if I stop brushing my teeth and marry my cousin, I expect to get called on that, too.

-b0b
(...racist? Yeah right.)

Quote:

Let Africa Sink

by Kim du Toit
November 19, 2002

Africa has to heal itself. The West can't help it. Nor should we. The record speaks for itself...

When it comes to any analysis of the problems facing Africa, Western society, and particularly people from the United States, encounter a logical disconnect that makes clear analysis impossible. That disconnect is the way life is regarded in the West (it's precious, must be protected at all costs etc.), compared to the way life, and death, are regarded in Africa. Let me try to quantify this statement.

In Africa, life is cheap. There are so many ways to die in Africa that death is far more commonplace than in the West. You can die from so many things--snakebite, insect bite, wild animal attack, disease, starvation, food poisoning... the list goes on and on. At one time, crocodiles accounted for more deaths in sub-Saharan Africa than gunfire, for example. Now add the usual human tragedy (murder, assault, warfare and the rest), and you can begin to understand why the life expectancy for an African is low--in fact, horrifyingly low, if you remove White Africans from the statistics (they tend to be more urbanized, and more Western in behavior and outlook). Finally, if you add the horrifying spread of AIDS into the equation, anyone born in sub-Saharan Africa this century will be lucky to reach age forty.

I lived in Africa for over thirty years. Growing up there, I was infused with several African traits--traits which are not common in Western civilization. The almost-casual attitude towards death was one. (Another is a morbid fear of snakes.)

So because of my African background, I am seldom moved at the sight of death, unless it's accidental, or it affects someone close to me. (Death which strikes at strangers, of course, is mostly ignored.) Of my circle of about eighteen or so friends with whom I grew up, and whom I would consider "close", only about ten survive today--and not one of the survivors is over the age of fifty.

Two friends died from stepping on landmines while on Army duty in Namibia. Three died in horrific car accidents (and lest one thinks that this is not confined to Africa, one was caused by a kudu flying through a windshield and impaling the guy through the chest with its hoof--not your everyday traffic accident in, say, Florida). One was bitten by a snake, and died from heart failure. Another also died of heart failure, but he was a hopeless drunkard. Two were shot by muggers. The last went out on his surfboard one day and was never seen again (did I mention that sharks are plentiful off the African coasts and in the major rivers?). My situation is not uncommon in South Africa--and north of the Limpopo River (the border with Zimbabwe), I suspect that others would show worse statistics.

The death toll wasn't just confined to my friends. When I was still living in Johannesburg, the newspaper carried daily stories of people mauled by lions, or attacked by rival tribesmen, or dying from some unspeakable disease (and this was pre-AIDS Africa too) and in general, succumbing to some of Africa's many answers to the population explosion. Add to that the normal death toll from rampant crime, illness, poverty, flood, famine, traffic, and the police, and you'll begin to get the idea.

My favorite African story actually happened after I left the country. An American executive took a job over there, and on his very first day, the newspaper headlines read: "Three Headless Bodies Found".

The next day: "Three Heads Found".

The third day: "Heads Don't Match Bodies". You can't make this stuff up.

As a result, death is treated more casually by Africans than by Westerners. I, and I suspect most Africans, am completely inured to reports of African suffering, for whatever cause. Drought causes crops to fail, thousands face starvation? Yup, that happened many times while I was growing up. Inter-tribal rivalry and warfare causes wholesale slaughter? Yep, been happening there for millennia, long before Whitey got there. Governments becoming rich and corrupt while their populations starved? Not more than nine or ten of those. In my lifetime, the following tragedies have occurred, causing untold millions of deaths: famine in Biafra, genocide in Rwanda, civil war in Angola, floods in South Africa, famine in Somalia, civil war in Sudan, famine in Ethiopia, floods in Mozambique, wholesale slaughter in Uganda, and tribal warfare in every single country. There are others, but you get the point.

Yes, all this was also true in Europe--maybe a thousand years ago. But not any more. And Europe doesn't teem with crocodiles, ultra-venomous snakes and so on.

The Dutch controlled the floods. All of Europe controls famine--it's non-existent now. Apart from a couple of examples of massive, state-sponsored slaughter (Nazi Germany, Communist Russia), Europe since 1700 doesn't even begin to compare to Africa today. Casual slaughter is another thing altogether--rare in Europe, common in Africa.

More to the point, the West has evolved into a society with a stable system of government, which follows the rule of law, and has respect for the rights and life of the individual--none of which is true in Africa.

Among old Africa hands, we have a saying, usually accompanied by a shrug: "Africa wins again." This is usually said after an incident such as:

- a beloved missionary is butchered by his congregation, for no apparent reason

- a tribal chief prefers to let his tribe starve to death rather than accepting food from the Red Cross (would mean he wasn't all-powerful, you see)

- an entire nation starves to death, while its ruler accumulates wealth in foreign banks

- a new government comes into power, promising democracy, free elections etc., provided that the freedom doesn't extend to the other tribe

- the other tribe comes to power in a bloody coup, then promptly sets about slaughtering the first tribe

...etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam, ad infinitum.

The prognosis is bleak, because none of this mayhem shows any sign of ending. The conclusions are equally bleak, because, quite frankly, there is no answer to Africa's problems, no solution that hasn't been tried before, and failed.

Just go to the CIA World Fact Book, pick any of the African countries (Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Malawi etc.), and compare the statistics to any Western country (eg. Portugal, Italy, Spain, Ireland). The disparities are appalling--and it's going to get worse, not better. It has certainly got worse since 1960, when most African countries achieved independence. We, and by this I mean the West, have tried many ways to help Africa. All such attempts have failed.

1. Charity is no answer. Money simply gets appropriated by the first, or second, or third person to touch it (17 countries saw a decline in real per capita GNP between 1970 and 1999, despite receiving well over $100 billion in World Bank assistance).

2. Food isn't distributed. This happens either because there is no transportation infrastructure (bad), or the local leader deliberately withholds the supplies to starve people into submission (worse).

3. Materiel is broken, stolen or sold off for a fraction of its worth. The result of decades of "foreign aid" has resulted in a continental infrastructure which, if one excludes South Africa, couldn't support Pittsburgh.

Add to this, as I mentioned above, the endless cycle of Nature's little bag of tricks--persistent drought followed by violent flooding, a plethora of animals, reptiles and insects so dangerous that life is already cheap before Man starts playing his little reindeer games with his fellow Man--and what you are left with is: catastrophe.

The inescapable conclusion is simply one of resignation. This goes against the grain of our humanity--we are accustomed to ridding the world of this or that problem (smallpox, polio, whatever), and accepting failure is anathema to us. But, to give a classic African scenario, a polio vaccine won't work if the kids are prevented from getting the vaccine by a venal overlord, or a frightened chieftain, or a lack of roads, or by criminals who steal the vaccine and sell it to someone else. If a cure for AIDS was found tomorrow, and offered to every African nation free of charge, the growth of the disease would scarcely be checked, let alone reversed. Basically, you'd have to try to inoculate as many two-year old children as possible, and write off the two older generations.

So that is the only one response, and it's a brutal one: accept that we are powerless to change Africa, and leave them to sink or swim, by themselves.

It sounds dreadful to say it, but if the entire African continent dissolves into a seething maelstrom of disease, famine and brutality, that's just too damn bad. We have better things to do--sometimes, you just have to say, "Can't do anything about it."

The viciousness, the cruelty, the corruption, the duplicity, the savagery, and the incompetence is endemic to the entire continent, and is so much of an anathema to any right-thinking person that the civilized imagination simply stalls when faced with its ubiquity, and with the enormity of trying to fix it. The Western media shouldn't even bother reporting on it. All that does is arouse our feelings of horror, and the instinctive need to do something, anything--but everything has been tried before, and failed. Everything, of course, except self-reliance.

All we should do is make sure that none of Africa gets transplanted over to the U.S., because the danger to our society is dire if it does. I note that several U.S. churches are attempting to bring groups of African refugees over to the United States, European churches the same for Europe. Mistake. Mark my words, this misplaced charity will turn around and bite us, big time.

Even worse would be to think that the simplicity of Africa holds some kind of answers for Western society: remember "It Takes A Village"? Trust me on this: there is not one thing that Africa can give the West which hasn't been tried before and failed, not one thing that isn't a step backwards, and not one thing which is worse than, or that contradicts, what we have already.

So here's my solution for the African fiasco: a high wall around the whole continent, all the guns and bombs in the world for everyone inside, and at the end, the last one alive should do us all a favor and kill himself.

Inevitably, some Kissingerian realpolitiker is going to argue in favor of intervention, because in the vacuum of Western aid, perhaps the Communist Chinese would step in and increase their influence in the area. There are two reasons why this isn't going to happen.

Firstly, the PRC doesn't have that kind of money to throw around; and secondly, the result of any communist assistance will be precisely the same as if it were Western assistance. For the record, Mozambique and Angola are both communist countries--and both are economic disaster areas. The prognosis for both countries is disastrous--and would be the same for any other African country.

Africa has to heal itself. The West can't help it. Nor should we. The record speaks for itself.

I'm not questioning the content of the pictures, rather the captions underneath them.

Quote:

Nigga please...

"Yo yo yo, fo' shizzle!"

Disclaimer: All similarities to Rap Stars, Hip-Hop practitioners and Gangstas of all races, ethnic origins and religions, living or dead, is purely intentional.

Comments like that are making light of a very serious situation. You could have people being killed at the other end of some of those pictures. I don't know, I just did not find the captions appropriate at all.

I didn't write them so I can't really tell you what the author was thinking, and I'll even go so far as to admit that some of them are harsh. However, that doesn't make them "racist" by any stretch of the imagination.

Yeah, people are dying over there, but at some point you have to stop feeling sorry for them. We've given them food, money, medicine, infrastructure, diplomatic support, and more. You name it, somebody has given it to them. Africa has received countless billions in economic and humanitarian aid, yet they continue to insist on fighting one another over every petty little thing. These people don't even know what they're fighting for. They're just blowing each other up for the heck of it. Why? My ultimate point is this: If they don't care, why should we?

I think If you dress up like a gangsta, talk like a gangsta, hold your `gat' like a gangsta, and die like a gangsta, you're probably a gangsta. It doesn't matter if you're black, white, or neon pink - you're a freakin' gangsta. I don't see how you can say the author is a "racist" simply because he calls it like he sees it.

If you want to call him cold, harsh, or emotionless, you might have some ground to stand on. But racist? Not a chance.

-b0b
(...pfft.)

I have to share this story real quick...

I was sitting in my ECE 250 class taking the exam, looking over my answers and I notice the professor is shaking everyone's hand as they leave the room when they finish their exam. So, I look up again and see a black guy walking to the door with a white kid RIGHT behind him. As they leave, the prof tells them to give the TAs their exam right outside the door. The black kid walks past, then the white kid walks past. Right as the white kid gets 1 foot past the prof, he taps him on the should and offers him a hand shake as the black guy has just walked through the door. How racist is that? I thought to myself...if this guy offers me a hand shake I will not do it and he will look like a dumbass. Luckily, he was rushing around in the halls when I finished and there was no confrontation.

So, let me make sure I've got this straight. He let the black student walk by and intentionally ignored him, but shook the hand of the white student? That's not right.

-b0b
(...thinks some professors need a good smackdown.)

Quote:

I think If you dress up like a gangsta, talk like a gangsta, hold your `gat' like a gangsta, and die like a gangsta, you're probably a gangsta. It doesn't matter if you're black, white, or neon pink - you're a freakin' gangsta.

wtf, like they even know what "gangsta" is over there. It's an stereotype that he's just slappin on those people in the photos. Sure, he prolly didn't intend any racism, but "Nigga please" isn't exactly being friendly.

Look at the way they dress. Look at their posture. Look at the way they shoot. These people just scream out the urban ghetto stereotype. The people in those photos look like Eminem/50 Cent poster children.

Sure, they might not be in Queens, but it seems rather obvious to me that America's hip hop trend has made it overseas. I've obviously not seen it first hand, but Monrovia the people in those pictures look like the Bloods vs. the Crips to me, just with more guns.

-b0b
(...!)

That is not what the "ghetto" looks like. Or how people act in it.

actually the word ghetto was derrived from the area during WW2 where the jews would normally live. They would all live in a concentrated area called "the ghetto" Doesn't look like many Jews live there....

The Geek Crew
http://www.TWNCommunications.Net/ForumOLD/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl General Category >> The Mother Board >> The Battle for Monrovia http://www.TWNCommunications.Net/ForumOLD/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1133965047 Message started by b0b on Dec 7^th, 2005 at 9:17am